← All workCASE STUDY
Insurance · Onboarding · A/B Testing

MetLife New User
Registration

A data-driven redesign of MetLife's user registration flow — cutting drop-offs by 80% through progressive disclosure, contextual tooltips, and SUS-scored A/B testing across 3 competing designs over 4–5 months.

Client
MetLife
Timeline
4–5 Months
Tools
Figma · A/B Testing · SUS Scoring
// DESIGN C ★ WINNER — My Design
MetLife Registration — Design C Winner
// DESIGN C · Personal Information Step · Contextual Tooltip Active
Project Impact

80% reduction in drop-offs — smoother onboarding, higher completion rates, and a better experience for employees enrolling in benefits.

80%
Drop-off Reduction
3
Designs A/B Tested
#1
SUS Score — My Design
MetLife Brand Compliant
Final Registration Flow — Steps 1 & 2

Personal Information → Identity Verification

The winning design uses a clear 3-step progress indicator in the left panel, progressive disclosure for each step, and contextual helper text — guiding users confidently from personal information through identity verification to account creation.

// STEP 1 — Personal Information
MetLife Registration Flow — Step 1 Personal Information
// STEP 1 · First Name · Last Name · Email · Phone · SSN · DOB · Zip · State
// STEP 2 — Identity Verification
MetLife Registration Flow — Step 2 Identity Verification
// STEP 2 · SMS Verification Code · Countdown Timer · Remember Device
Three Designs Tested — One Clear Winner

Design A · Design B · Design C ★

Three competing registration flows were designed and tested. Each was evaluated on task completion time, user satisfaction rating, and drop-off rate. SUS scoring across all three versions confirmed Design C as the winner on every metric.

// DESIGN A
MetLife Registration Design A
// DESIGN A · Minimal layout · No left panel · Basic field structure
// Assessment
  • — Simple two-column form layout
  • — No progress indicator
  • — Missing contextual guidance
  • — Higher cognitive load reported
// DESIGN B
MetLife Registration Design B
// DESIGN B · Validate → Verify → Create flow · Bottom progress bar
// Assessment
  • — Clear step-by-step structure
  • — Bottom progress bar less visible
  • — Left panel smaller, less guidance
  • — Second best SUS score
// DESIGN C ★ WINNER
MetLife Registration Design C — Winner
// DESIGN C ★ · Left panel steps · Contextual tooltip · Highest SUS
// Why it won
  • ✓ Left panel with visible progress steps
  • ✓ Contextual tooltips (e.g. personal email)
  • ✓ Fastest task completion time
  • ✓ Highest user satisfaction rating
Winning Design — In Detail

Design C: what made it work

Design C combined a contextual left panel showing step progress, inline tooltip guidance for sensitive fields (SSN, email), a masked SSN field with eye toggle, and a clear "Why are we asking for this?" link — all reducing anxiety and cognitive friction at each step.

// DESIGN C · Personal Info · Tooltip Active
Design C with tooltip
// DESIGN C · Email tooltip: "Personal email recommended" · SSN masked
// FULL FLOW · Step 1 Complete
Complete Step 1 flow
// STEP 1 COMPLETE · All fields · Additional Zip + State fields
Mobile Responsive View

Fully responsive — progress bar adapts to top strip

On mobile the left panel collapses into a horizontal progress stepper at the top — keeping the 3-step journey always visible while giving maximum space to the form fields below.

// MOBILE · Validation Error State
MetLife Registration Mobile View
// MOBILE · Inline Validation Error · "First Name is a required field" · Progress top bar
// Mobile Adaptations
  • //Left panel → horizontal progress bar at top of page
  • //Full-width input fields — touch-optimised tap targets
  • //Inline validation errors appear directly below field
  • //Required field error: red border + red helper text
  • //"Personal email is recommended" link preserved
// Error Prevention Strategy

Inline validation fires on blur — not on submit — catching errors field-by-field. This reduces the frustration of seeing multiple errors at once and guides users to correct issues as they go.

// Accessibility

Error messages are associated with inputs via aria-describedby — screen readers announce the error immediately when the field loses focus.

Research & Design Process

Seven phases — discovery to post-launch

Phase Activities Outputs
Discovery & Audit Reviewed existing overlay & flow, mapped all pain points UX audit, workflow diagram, heuristics report
User Research Usability tests with new users — identified findability and CTA confusion Key pain points: findability, unclear CTAs
Ideation Multiple wireframes addressing entry point clarity and flow simplification Annotated wireframes, 3 prototype variations
A/B Testing Designed & tested 3 flows — 1 by me (C), 2 by team members (A, B) Analytics on click-throughs and drop-offs
SUS Evaluation System Usability Scale scoring across all 3 versions quantitatively Comparative SUS scores — Design C wins
Design Finalization Implemented stakeholder feedback on winning prototype (C) Hi-fi Figma mockups + handoff documentation
Post-launch Review Assessed usage via user feedback and analytics post-launch Positive reception — 80% drop-off reduction confirmed
Research & Design Artefacts

Supporting documentation — open in new tab

The research and design artefacts produced throughout this project are available below. Each document opens in a new tab as a PDF.

// All documents open in a new tab as PDF

Complete Screen Gallery

All 6 screens — flow, designs, and mobile

Design C
Design C ★ · Winner · Tooltip Active
Design A
Design A · Minimal · No panel
Design B
Design B · Bottom progress · Alt layout
Flow Step 1
Step 1 · Personal Information · Complete
Flow Step 2
Step 2 · Identity Verification · SMS Code
Mobile View
Mobile · Validation Error State · Required field
Before vs After — What Changed

From a hidden link to a guided 3-step journey

// BEFORE — Problems
  • Registration buried inside a "Login" link — invisible to new users
  • Combined Login/Registration overlay created cognitive friction
  • No progress indicator — users didn't know how many steps remained
  • Sensitive fields (SSN, DOB) had no contextual explanation
  • High drop-off rate before completing even step one
// AFTER — Solutions
  • Distinct "Register Now" CTA in the login overlay — clearly visible
  • 3-step progress stepper in left panel shows users exactly where they are
  • Contextual tooltips for email ("use personal email") and SSN ("why we ask")
  • Inline validation on blur — errors caught field-by-field, not on submit
  • Aligned to MetLife brand guidelines and accessibility standards

KEEP EXPLORING

More selected work ↗

OPEN TO FREELANCE & FULL-TIME OPPORTUNITIES

Let’s make
something useful.

Start a conversation ↗